Module 7: Stressors Affecting Thought Processes and Perceptions

Learning Objectives:

Key Focus Areas:

Key Terms:

Stressors Affecting Thought Processes and Perceptions (Psychosis & Schizophrenia)

Introduction

Psychotic disorders are severe mental health conditions characterized by a loss of contact with reality. Patients experience profound disturbances in thought processes and perceptions, such as delusions (fixed false beliefs) and hallucinations (perceiving things that are not present). These disorders include schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, brief psychotic disorder, delusional disorder, and mood disorders like bipolar disorder with psychotic features. Schizophrenia is the prototypical psychotic disorder, affecting about 1% of the population worldwide and ranking among the top causes of disability globally​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Although each disorder has unique features, all involve psychosis – a state in which the individual has difficulty distinguishing reality, severely impairing functioning. This module provides an in-depth overview of these disorders, covering clinical features, neurobiology, risk factors, diagnostic criteria (DSM-5-TR), treatments, nursing interventions, case examples, and key ethical/legal considerations. The goal is to equip BSN-level nursing students with a comprehensive understanding of psychosis and evidence-based care strategies.

Clinical Features of Psychotic Disorders

Psychotic disorders share a common set of clinical features that can be grouped into four categories: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognitive symptoms, and mood-related symptoms.

Each specific disorder has a distinct profile of these symptoms. Schizophrenia typically includes a mix of positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms over a chronic course. Schizoaffective disorder by definition adds prominent mood symptoms to the schizophrenic symptom spectrum. Brief psychotic disorder presents mainly with positive symptoms (delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech/behavior) but for a very short duration. Delusional disorder is unique in that delusions are the primary or sole symptom – hallucinations and disorganization are absent or minimal – and functioning aside from the delusional impact is relatively preserved​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. In bipolar disorder with psychotic features, classic mood symptoms (euphoria, irritability, or depression) dominate the clinical picture, with psychosis emerging only at the extremes of mood disturbance. Despite these differences, psychosis itself – the break from reality – is the key feature linking all these conditions.

Neurobiological Underpinnings

The exact causes of psychotic disorders are complex and multifactorial, but research has identified several neurobiological underpinnings that help explain psychosis. Key aspects include dysregulation in specific neurotransmitter pathways (especially dopamine), structural brain abnormalities, and a neurodevelopmental origin for these illnesses.

Modern perspectives refine the dopamine hypothesis: rather than a simple excess, there is dysregulated dopamine signaling. An influential theory is that psychosis involves aberrant salience, meaning the dopamine system randomly assigns importance or “salience” to innocuous stimuli​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. This misfires the brain’s reward-learning mechanism, so the person might become preoccupied with meaningless environmental details or internal thoughts, forming delusional interpretations. For example, a patient might notice every red car on the street and believe this “pattern” confirms they are being followed – the brain’s dopamine-driven salience detector is essentially flagging incorrect information as significant​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Supporting this, neuroimaging shows elevated dopamine synthesis and release in the striatum of people with schizophrenia, especially during psychotic episodes​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Antipsychotic medications reducing dopamine activity help dampen this aberrant salience, thereby reducing psychotic experiences.

It’s also noteworthy that antipsychotics produce their peak blockade of dopamine receptors within hours, yet clinical improvement in psychosis typically takes 2–4 weeks. This delay suggests downstream changes (e.g. receptor modulation, gene expression changes) are necessary for full antipsychotic effect​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. It highlights that dopamine dysregulation is necessary but not solely sufficient to explain psychosis, leading to investigation of other systems.

Understanding these biological underpinnings helps nurses educate patients and families (e.g., explaining that schizophrenia is a brain-based illness – not a personal failing – and why medications and early intervention are crucial). It also provides a rationale for treatments (for example, why dopamine-blocking drugs help reduce hallucinations, or why cognitive remediation therapy targets frontal lobe function). While the exact pathophysiology remains under investigation, it is clear that psychosis has a biological basis involving brain chemistry and structure, influenced by developmental and genetic factors.

Genetic, Environmental, and Psychosocial Risk Factors

Psychotic disorders arise from a combination of genetic predispositions and environmental or psychosocial stressors. Identifying risk factors is important for understanding who might be vulnerable and why. Key factors include:

In summary, genetic factors create a predisposition to psychotic disorders, while environmental and psychosocial factors modulate the timing and likelihood of onset. There is often no single cause; rather, multiple hits accumulate. For instance, a hypothetical high-risk profile might be: a young adult male with a family history of schizophrenia, who had birth complications, smoked cannabis heavily in teens, and then experienced social isolation and trauma – such an individual’s risk of psychosis would be markedly elevated. Understanding these risk factors is important for prevention (e.g. avoiding adolescent substance abuse in vulnerable youth), early detection of those at high risk, and communicating to families that these illnesses have complex origins beyond anyone’s control.

Diagnostic Criteria (DSM-5-TR) for Major Psychotic Disorders

Diagnosis of psychotic disorders is based on criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). While all these disorders involve psychosis, DSM-5-TR delineates them by symptom configuration, duration, and the presence of mood symptoms. Below is an overview of diagnostic criteria for each major psychotic disorder:

Schizophrenia

According to DSM-5-TR, schizophrenia is diagnosed when the following criteria are met​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:

DSM-5 (and DSM-5-TR) notably eliminated the old schizophrenia subtypes (paranoid, disorganized, catatonic, etc.) due to limited diagnostic stability and value. Instead, clinicians may specify features like “with catatonia” or rate the severity of dimensions (hallucinations, delusions, etc.). In practice, a classic presentation meeting the above might be: a young adult gradually developing social withdrawal and odd beliefs (prodrome), then experiencing two months of hallucinations and delusions with deteriorating self-care (active phase), followed by partial remission with some residual flat affect and mild paranoia – if the overall duration from onset through residual is ≥6 months, schizophrenia criteria are fulfilled. Schizophrenia is typically a chronic condition with episodic exacerbations of psychosis superimposed on baseline residual symptoms.

Schizoaffective Disorder

Schizoaffective disorder is characterized by features of both schizophrenia and mood disorder. It is essentially a hybrid of psychosis and mood disturbance. DSM-5-TR criteria include​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:

Specify type based on mood component: Bipolar type (if mania is part of the presentation; may also have depression) or Depressive type (if only major depressions occur without any mania)​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

For example, a patient might have a long-term history of schizophrenia-like symptoms plus intermittent episodes of mood disorder. One scenario: over a 5-year course, the patient had chronic delusions and blunted affect, and twice developed severe depression for a few months. During one depression, he still heard voices for a month after his mood improved – fulfilling the 2-week psychosis-alone criterion. This would fit schizoaffective disorder, depressive type. The diagnosis has been challenging and somewhat controversial (due to reliability issues), and some experts consider whether it’s a distinct entity or overlapping schizophrenia and mood disorder​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Nevertheless, DSM-5-TR retains schizoaffective as a separate diagnosis for such mixed presentations.

Brief Psychotic Disorder

Brief psychotic disorder is diagnosed when an individual has a sudden onset of psychotic symptoms that are short-lived. The DSM-5-TR criteria are​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:

Specify if: With marked stressor(s) (formerly “brief reactive psychosis,” where symptoms are a reaction to events like trauma or extreme stress), Without marked stressor, or With postpartum onset (if onset is within 4 weeks postpartum). For example, a person with no psychiatric history might have a brief psychotic break after an overwhelming life event – such as days of bizarre delusions and hallucinations following a natural disaster or personal trauma – but then recover completely within a couple weeks. Another example is postpartum psychosis, which often begins within days to weeks after childbirth; it can be a brief psychotic disorder or sometimes a presentation of bipolar disorder.

Brief psychotic disorder is less common than other psychotic disorders and often is an isolated incident, but it can sometimes progress to schizophrenia or mood disorders in some individuals. It’s important for nursing to recognize that safety during the acute episode is paramount (even if short, the psychosis can be severe), and that with proper treatment and support, these patients have a good prognosis for full recovery of function.

Delusional Disorder

Delusional disorder is characterized by the presence of persistent delusions in an otherwise well-functioning person. DSM-5-TR criteria include​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:

Specify delusional subtype based on theme: Erotomanic (belief someone is in love with the patient), Grandiose, Jealous, Persecutory, Somatic, Mixed, or Unspecified. Also specify if With bizarre content (delusion is clearly implausible, e.g. alien abduction).

An example: a person firmly believes they are being poisoned by neighbors (persecutory delusion) but otherwise behaves normally – they continue working, no hallucinations, conversation is rational except when discussing this specific belief. This could be delusional disorder. Nursing considerations include building trust so the patient might accept treatment (often these patients may refuse antipsychotics since they don’t believe they are ill – they are convinced the delusion is real). It’s also critical to assess safety, because some individuals with persecutory or jealous delusions may become aggressive (e.g. harming the imagined persecutors or a suspected unfaithful partner).

Overall, delusional disorder tends to be more stable and chronic; many patients do not seek treatment for years because their functioning isn’t grossly impaired. When they do get treatment, it’s often due to consequences of the delusion (like legal issues from stalking in erotomania, or depression due to somatic delusions). The nurse’s approach is often to empathize with the distress caused by the delusion without directly challenging its truth initially, and encourage adherence to therapy and medication that might help ease the distress or insight.

Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features

In bipolar disorder, psychotic features can appear during extreme mood episodes. The DSM-5-TR does not define this as a separate disorder, but rather as a specifier for Bipolar I or Bipolar II disorder: “with psychotic features.” Key points include:

In summary, when evaluating psychosis, context is critical: if it’s persistent and primary, think schizophrenia; if it’s mixed with mood disturbances, think schizoaffective; if it’s brief, think brief psychotic disorder; if it’s isolated delusions, think delusional disorder; if it’s restricted to episodes of mania or depression, think bipolar (or major depression) with psychotic features. The DSM-5-TR criteria help ensure accurate diagnosis by these distinctions, which in turn guides appropriate treatment planning.

Differential Diagnoses

Many conditions can manifest psychosis, so nurses and clinicians must consider a broad differential diagnosis when encountering psychotic symptoms​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Key differentials include:

Distinguishing among these possibilities requires thorough history (including timeline of symptom emergence and substance use history), physical exam and appropriate investigations (to rule out medical causes), and collateral information from family or others. Nurses play a key role in this process by observing the patient closely over time (psychotic symptoms can vary day to day), gathering psychosocial history, and facilitating necessary lab tests or consultations. For example, a nurse might notice that a patient’s visual hallucinations worsen at night and they have fluctuating confusion – communicating this could lead the team to discover undiagnosed delirium. Or a nurse doing an intake interview learns the patient had been using meth daily – guiding the differential toward substance-induced psychosis.

In summary, psychosis is a syndrome with many potential causes. The DSM-5-TR diagnostic system helps categorize primary psychiatric psychoses, but clinicians must exclude other etiologies. The differential diagnosis remains broad: from functional disorders like schizophrenia and bipolar, to substance effects, to medical/neuro conditions. Accurate diagnosis ensures the patient receives appropriate treatment (for instance, treating a UTI-induced delirium with antibiotics and supportive care, rather than antipsychotics alone). As a nurse, recognizing red flags and advocating for comprehensive evaluation is critical for patient safety and effective care​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Psychopharmacology Treatment

Medications are a cornerstone in the treatment of psychotic disorders. They are primarily used to control acute psychotic symptoms and to prevent relapse. The main classes of medications include antipsychotics (the primary treatment for psychosis) and adjunctive agents like mood stabilizers or antidepressants when mood symptoms are present. A thorough understanding of these medications, their effects, side effects, and monitoring is essential for nursing practice.

Antipsychotic Medications

Antipsychotics can be broadly divided into first-generation (typical) and second-generation (atypical) agents:

In acute settings, antipsychotics may be given IM for rapid tranquilization. Common emergency treatments are IM haloperidol often combined with lorazepam (and sometimes diphenhydramine or benztropine to reduce dystonia risk) – the so-called “B52” (Benadryl 50mg, Haloperidol 5mg, Lorazepam 2mg) cocktail – to calm an acutely agitated psychotic patient. Monitoring after IM administration is critical for excessive sedation or acute side effects.

For bipolar disorder with psychosis or schizoaffective (bipolar type), antipsychotics are usually combined with mood stabilizers (see below). Importantly, some SGAs (like Quetiapine, Lurasidone) are also effective for bipolar depression, giving them dual roles.

Mood Stabilizers and Adjunct Medications

In disorders where mood symptoms are prominent (schizoaffective, bipolar with psychotic features), mood stabilizing medications are indicated alongside antipsychotics:

Medication regimens can become complex (e.g., a schizoaffective patient on an antipsychotic, mood stabilizer, and antidepressant). Nursing responsibilities include: ensuring adherence (especially since poor insight can lead to refusal – strategies include psychoeducation, involving family, considering LAI forms), monitoring for side effects and advocating for management of side effects, and performing necessary monitoring tests (weight, labs for metabolic syndrome, WBC for clozapine, lithium levels, etc.). Educating patients about their medications empowers them: for instance, explaining that “this injection will keep a steady level of medicine to protect you from relapse” or “this pill might make you a bit sleepy at first, but it will help stop the voices.”

Importantly, nurses often see patients more frequently than prescribers do – so they are the first to notice if medication isn’t working (e.g., patient still responding to internal stimuli after a few weeks) or if it’s causing distress (patient is too sedated, or complaining of side effects). The nurse should communicate these observations so the treatment plan can be adjusted (e.g., dose titration, side effect treatment, or medication change if needed). Given the chronic nature of many psychotic disorders, long-term medication management is a marathon, not a sprint – the nurse’s supportive role and frequent check-ins can greatly affect a patient’s willingness to continue treatment.

Non-Pharmacologic Treatment

While medications are essential, non-pharmacologic treatments play a crucial role in the comprehensive care of psychotic disorders. Psychosocial interventions can significantly improve functional outcomes, reduce relapse rates, and enhance quality of life​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. In a recovery-oriented approach, medications address the biology, but these interventions address skills, coping, and support systems. Major evidence-based non-pharmacological treatments include:

It is worth noting that combining pharmacologic and psychosocial treatments yields the best outcomes​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. For example, medication might reduce hallucinations enough that a patient can engage in therapy, and therapy in turn helps them cope with any remaining symptoms and get back to school or work. Evidence-based guidelines (e.g., the APA Practice Guideline for Schizophrenia) recommend a range of psychosocial interventions (CBTp, family intervention, supported employment, etc.) as standard components of treatment​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Nursing interventions often overlap with these therapies. As a nurse, you might co-lead a psychoeducation group for families, run a daily living skills group on the inpatient unit, or reinforce the use of a coping skill a patient learned in CBT. You’ll also monitor and encourage participation: for instance, if John usually skips art therapy group because he’s withdrawn, a nurse might escort him there and stay a few minutes to help him feel comfortable. It’s also within the nursing role to help coordinate these services – ensuring the patient is connected with an outpatient therapist, scheduling a family meeting, or arranging transportation for a day program.

Finally, community resources are an extension of non-pharmacologic treatment. Encourage patients and families to engage with organizations like the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), which offers free classes (like Family-to-Family), support groups, and advocacy. Such involvement can reduce stigma and empower patients to take an active role in their recovery journey.

In essence, non-drug interventions address the many dimensions of psychotic disorders that medication alone cannot: managing stress, improving relationships, finding meaningful roles, and fostering hope. As a nurse, being knowledgeable about and involved in these therapies makes you a vital part of the patient’s long-term recovery and reintegration into society.

Nursing Interventions and Care Strategies

Nursing care for patients with psychosis is challenging but immensely important. Nurses are often the front-line caregivers managing patients’ basic needs, safety, and therapeutic environment. Key nursing interventions include ensuring safety, establishing effective communication, creating a supportive milieu, assisting with self-care, and preparing patients for life after hospitalization (long-term management and support). Interventions can be considered in the context of the acute phase (when psychosis is florid) versus the stable or recovery phase, but many principles apply across settings.

1. Ensuring Safety: Safety is the top priority when caring for acutely psychotic patients. They may be disoriented, fearful, or responding to internal stimuli, which can lead to unintentional or intentional harm.

2. Therapeutic Communication: Communicating with a psychotic patient requires patience, clarity, and empathy. The nurse-patient relationship is a key therapeutic tool – often, you will be the reality anchor for a disoriented patient.

3. Milieu and Environmental Management: The therapeutic milieu is the structured environment of the hospital/unit that can itself be healing if managed well.

4. Medication Management and Adherence Support: A critical nursing role is ensuring that patients receive medications as prescribed and understand them.

5. Psychosocial Support and Rehabilitation: Nurses often double as counselors and coaches for patients preparing to reintegrate into the community.

Throughout, maintain a person-centered approach: treat the patient as a whole person, not just a collection of symptoms. Respect their preferences when possible (like allowing a paranoid patient to keep the door open if it makes them less anxious, as long as it’s safe). Cultural sensitivity is key too – understand that some cultures might interpret psychotic-like experiences (visions, spiritual encounters) differently, and incorporate the patient’s cultural and spiritual beliefs into care. For example, if a patient finds solace in faith, facilitate chaplain visits or prayer time.

Case in point: During an acute psychotic break, a patient named John believed staff were FBI agents. The nurse consistently introduced herself, spoke softly, and ensured John had a quiet space. When John shouted about FBI surveillance, the nurse responded, “I know you’re scared. I’m a nurse, not an FBI agent, and I’m here to help you stay safe​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.” She offered his PRN medication. Over a few days, with trust building, John began to accept oral haloperidol. As his paranoia lessened, the nurse encouraged him to join a music activity, praising him when he played the drum for a few minutes. She educated his family on avoiding arguing about his delusions and instead reassuring him of his safety. By discharge, John, his family, and the nurse crafted a relapse plan: his family would watch for early signs (like John isolating or mumbling to himself) and John agreed to continue medications and follow up with the community mental health team. John left with improved reality testing and a positive connection to the nursing staff, which increased his confidence in managing his illness.

In summary, nursing interventions in psychosis span from minute-to-minute management of behavior to long-term psychosocial support. The acute phase requires a focus on safety, basic needs, and short, frequent interactions; the stable phase allows more teaching, rehabilitative work, and therapeutic engagement. Nurses are the linchpin of continuity – often coordinating between the hospital, family, and community resources – and their compassionate, structured care can greatly influence a patient’s trajectory toward recovery.

Case Study Examples

To illustrate the nursing approach, here are two case studies applying the above principles:

Case Study 1: First-Episode Schizophrenia
Scenario: Alex is a 19-year-old college sophomore who has no prior psychiatric history. Over the past semester, his roommates noticed Alex became increasingly isolated, staying in his room and murmuring to himself. One night, campus security brings Alex to the emergency department after he was found wandering the dorm hallway disorganized and frightened. Alex is responding to unseen stimuli, muttering about “voices from the walls.” On admission, he is actively hallucinating (he hears two voices commenting on his actions) and has paranoid delusions that the hospital staff are spying on him for a secret project. He is very anxious, occasionally shouting “Leave me alone!” with eyes cast at the ceiling corners.

Assessment: Alex is experiencing a florid first psychotic episode, likely schizophrenia given the subacute onset and classic symptoms (hallucinations, paranoia, disorganization). He currently lacks insight into his illness. He has not slept or eaten well for a couple of days (per roommates). No substance use is detected on tox screen, and medical workup is negative. Nursing diagnoses may include: Disturbed Sensory Perception (auditory), Disturbed Thought Processes, Fear, Risk for Violence (self-directed or other-directed) due to paranoid ideation, Self-care Deficit, and Sleep Deprivation.

Interventions (Acute Phase): The admitting nurse places Alex in a low-stimulation private room near the nurses’ station. Softly, the nurse introduces herself and reorients Alex: “You are in the hospital. I am a nurse, and you are safe here. I know you’re hearing voices, but I will do my best to help you.” She speaks in short, simple sentences and maintains a calm tone. When Alex shouts at the voices, the nurse responds, “I don’t hear those voices, but I understand you do. It must be scary. You are safe, and I’m here with you.” This validates his feelings and grounds him. The nurse offers medication: the doctor has ordered Haloperidol 5 mg orally and Lorazepam 2 mg orally. Alex initially refuses, saying “No, you’re trying to drug me.” The nurse does not push immediately; instead, she suggests sitting in the quiet room with him and offers a snack (he refuses food, fearing poisoning). After some time building rapport – talking about his favorite music (one thing his roommate mentioned) – the nurse gently revisits the topic of medication: “That anxiety you feel might ease up with this medicine. It’s here to help the voices quiet down.” Alex still hesitates, but when the nurse offers the medication in liquid form (to allay his fear of pills) and agrees to have bottled water (sealed) for him to drink, he consents. The nurse stays with him as he takes it, providing praise: “You did the right thing, taking medicine is a step toward feeling better.”

Over the next 24 hours, the haloperidol begins to tranquilize the more aggressive voices. Alex becomes drowsy, and the nurse ensures he gets some sleep (they let him rest undisturbed, recognizing sleep is therapeutic after probable days of insomnia). On waking, Alex is quieter though still responding in whispers to hallucinations. The nurse helps him with hygiene: she notices he is wearing the same clothes from admission and has body odor. She kindly says, “Let’s get you freshened up. A shower can help you feel more relaxed. I’ll get you a towel and soap.” She gives step-by-step prompts during the shower (“The shampoo is next to you – go ahead and wash your hair.”) to compensate for his disorganized thinking. Afterward, she guides him to the dining area for breakfast. Alex voices fear: “The food might be contaminated.” The nurse offers packaged cereal and milk carton, opening them in front of Alex to show they’re sealed. She also engages another patient (who is further in recovery) to sit with them; this peer casually chats, which models normal interaction. Alex manages to eat a little.

As days progress, with scheduled doses of antipsychotic, Alex’s positive symptoms recede somewhat. He still has delusional thoughts but is less agitated. The nurse begins to educate him: she explains that he has an illness that can cause these experiences, much like how diabetes can cause symptoms if untreated. She uses the analogy that the brain can get sick and produce “tricks” on the senses. Alex is partially receptive – he isn’t fully convinced but no longer thinks the staff are spying on him. The nurse involves Alex’s parents (with his permission) for family education. She explains the importance of medication adherence and recognizing early signs (they recall he was isolating and not sleeping weeks before – they now know these were red flags). They attend a family psychoeducation meeting on the unit, where they learn communication skills (like not arguing about delusions).

Before discharge, the nurse and Alex develop a relapse prevention plan: Alex identifies that when voices start creeping back or if he feels paranoid that people whisper about him, he should tell someone and seek help. He agrees to continue his risperidone (the team transitioned him to an atypical antipsychotic) after discharge and follow up at an early psychosis intervention clinic. The nurse arranges the first appointment and gives him a written list of symptoms that, if they return, mean he should call the clinic. By discharge, Alex is clear enough to express insight that “I was sick and the hospital helped me.” Though he still has low-level paranoia, he has built trust with the nursing staff such that he’s willing to continue treatment.

Outcome: Alex returns to college the next semester with ongoing outpatient treatment. His family actively supports him and knows warning signs. A year later, he is living with his parents and working part-time, engaging in therapy, and has had only minor exacerbations that were managed without rehospitalization. This case shows how acute nursing care (safety, med administration, communication, basic care) combined with education and aftercare planning set the stage for recovery.

Case Study 2: Schizoaffective Disorder (Bipolar Type)
Scenario: Maria is a 30-year-old female with known schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. She has had two prior hospitalizations – one for mania with psychosis, one for depression with suicidal ideation. She was non-adherent to her medication (stopped both lithium and quetiapine two weeks ago). She is brought to the hospital by her family for acute mania: for the past week, Maria had been sleeping only 1–2 hours a night, talking rapidly about having a “special cosmic power,” spending large sums of money on unnecessary items, and she became irritable and aggressive when family tried to curb her behaviors. On admission, Maria is exuberant, hyperverbal, and psychotic – she believes she is the “Queen of the Universe” and that staff are her royal subjects. She has auditory hallucinations of a voice that praises her greatness. She is easily distracted and flits from topic to topic. No evidence of depression at this time – she is euphoric and on the verge of losing behavioral control due to impulsivity.

Assessment: Maria’s presentation is consistent with a manic episode with psychotic features (mood-congruent delusions of grandeur). She has impaired judgment and heightened risk-taking (could accidentally harm herself due to recklessness, e.g., driving recklessly believing she’s invincible). Also, Risk for Injury (from hyperactivity/exhaustion), Risk for Other-Directed Violence (if severely irritable), Disturbed Thought Processes, Impaired Mood Regulation are relevant nursing diagnoses. Also, Self-care Deficit (she’s too busy to eat or rest).

Interventions: The nurse in the inpatient unit prioritizes safety and physical health in this acutely manic psychotic patient. Maria is very active, trying to run in the halls. The nurse uses a calm but firm approach: “Maria, let’s walk together to the day room. I want to talk with you,” thereby directing her energy in a safe direction. The nurse ensures the environment is safe – removing any potentially sharp objects (Maria came in wearing a scarf; staff remove it in case she might tie it around something or someone impulsively). Given Maria’s reduced nutritional intake at home and on the unit (she’s too distracted to sit and eat a meal), the nurse provides finger foods that she can nibble on the go – for example, handing her a sandwich cut into quarters and a carton of high-protein shake to drink while walking​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. The nurse gently reminds her to take bites: “Here, have a bite of this sandwich; it will give you energy.”

To handle Maria’s grandiose delusions, the nurse does not overtly challenge her claims of royalty (that could provoke anger), but also doesn’t play along. When Maria commands, “You, servant, bring me my throne!” the nurse responds with a bit of redirection: “I’m your nurse, Maria, and right now I’ll bring you this chair to sit in so we can check your blood pressure.” This acknowledges her request (a chair) but reframes it clinically. The nurse might add, “Let’s take some deep breaths together, you seem very excited.” Throughout, the nurse remains respectful – not laughing at the delusion, but perhaps using a neutral tone to respond to her statements. If Maria starts shouting orders at other patients (“Bow to your Queen!”), the nurse would set a limit: “Maria, other people here are not going to do that. I need you to use a quieter voice and respect their space. Come, let’s go to your room for a bit.” Removing her from the stimulation of group areas can help, as mania + psychosis can escalate with audience.

Medication management is critical. The physician orders an IM injection of Haloperidol 5mg and Lorazepam 2mg for acute control (since Maria is refusing oral meds in her manic state, believing they are unnecessary for someone as powerful as her). The nurse approaches with the injection and explains in simple terms: “This is medicine to help slow your mind down and help you feel more in control.” Maria may resist, saying “I don’t need that! I am in control of galaxies!” The nurse might involve another staff to gently assist and say, “This medicine is an important part of your treatment; we’ll be quick.” After the IM haloperidol, within an hour Maria is less pressured in speech and can stay seated. The nurse then engages her in a one-on-one activity to channel some energy – perhaps folding towels (many manic patients like to be active, so giving a simple task like sorting laundry can be calming and give a sense of purpose).

By day 2, Maria is started on Risperidone oral and restarted on Lithium. The nurse monitors her vital signs and hydration carefully – mania can lead to dehydration. Also, the nurse monitors for EPS from haloperidol; when Maria develops a mild tremor, they provide benztropine per protocol. The nurse also ensures rest: at night, they provide a low-stimuli environment and possibly a dose of Zolpidem for sleep as ordered. Sleep is a priority outcome – by the second night Maria sleeps 6 hours, which greatly helps her clarity of thought.

As Maria’s mania and psychosis begin to subside (by day 4, she no longer believes she’s a queen, though she’s embarrassed by her actions), the nurse works on insight and medication adherence. The nurse sits with Maria in a quiet moment and discusses her illness: “Maria, you have a condition that can make your moods go very high and very low, and sometimes you hear or believe things that aren’t true. It’s not your fault – it’s like any other illness. But we have medicines that can help keep you balanced.” Maria listens and admits, “I stopped my meds because I felt fine… I guess that was a mistake.” They explore this: the nurse asks what she disliked about the meds. Maria says lithium made her feel bloated and she didn’t think she needed it. This opens a teaching opportunity: the nurse reviews signs of relapse (insomnia, spending sprees) and the importance of staying on meds as prevention. They brainstorm solutions: maybe adjusting her diet to reduce bloating, and scheduling blood draws conveniently. The nurse suggests involving a peer support specialist – another individual with bipolar who is stable on meds – to talk to Maria about the benefits of staying adherent.

Before discharge, a meeting with Maria’s family is held. The nurse, social worker, Maria, and her parents create a plan: Maria will move in with her sister for a month for extra support, she’ll attend an outpatient day program (providing structure and medication monitoring each morning), and the family will lock away credit cards for now to prevent impulsive spending. The nurse teaches the family to watch for early symptoms: if Maria starts sleeping less or talking about grandiose ideas, they should call the psychiatrist right away. They also discuss plans for adherence: Maria agrees to try a long-acting injectable antipsychotic (Risperdal Consta) to avoid daily pills, and she sets an alarm on her phone for taking lithium at night. They schedule her first outpatient appointment and the nurse provides a 1-week medication supply to bridge the gap.

Outcome: With these supports, Maria remains out of the hospital for a long period, maintaining stability. She has minor depressive episodes but with quick interventions (med dose adjustments and therapy) they don’t become psychotic. The case shows how integrated nursing care – acute management of mania (safety, meds, nutrition, limit-setting), combined with psychoeducation and aftercare planning – helps a patient with a chronic psychotic disorder regain stability and reduce future crises.

Teaching Points from the Case Studies: In both, we see the importance of:

These scenarios reinforce how theory translates to practice – the nursing interventions outlined in previous sections come alive in real situations, and the nurse’s role is shown to be pivotal in assessment, intervention, and coordination of care.

Interprofessional Collaboration

Managing psychotic disorders effectively requires an interprofessional team approach, as these illnesses impact multiple facets of a patient’s life and need a range of expertise​ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Collaboration among healthcare providers, patients, and families ensures comprehensive care. Key aspects of interprofessional collaboration in psychosis:

Overall, clear communication and shared goals are the hallmark of effective interprofessional collaboration. This can be achieved through structured team meetings (like weekly case conferences where each team member updates on their aspect of care), care plans that are accessible to all disciplines (so everyone knows the plan for managing hallucinations, for example), and a culture of mutual respect where each professional’s input is valued. The patient (and family, when appropriate) should be considered key members of the team too – incorporating their goals (like wanting to return to school) aligns the team’s efforts.

From a nursing standpoint, the nurse often acts as the “hub” of the wheel – frequently in contact with the patient and interfacing with all other team members. For instance, the nurse might relay to the psychiatrist that the patient’s sibling (who visited today) reports the patient hasn’t been taking their home meds – critical info for the prescriber. Or the nurse might notice the patient is too sedated to participate in therapy groups and discuss with the team about adjusting med timing or dose. In community settings, a case management nurse might coordinate appointments: scheduling therapy right after the injection visit to ensure the patient attends both.

Interprofessional collaboration also means unified messaging to the patient. If the psychiatrist says one thing and the therapist another, it confuses the patient. Team members should discuss any differing views internally and present a consistent plan. For example, if the patient asks the nurse, “Do I really need these meds? My therapist said I’m doing great,” the nurse should clarify any misunderstanding (the therapist likely didn’t mean to stop meds) and reinforce the consensus: “Yes, you’re doing great because the meds are helping, so we all feel you should continue them.”

Finally, engaging community partners is part of collaboration – e.g., if the patient is involved with a vocational rehab agency, the team might invite that coach to a team meeting (with consent) to align goals (maybe adjusting work hours as part of recovery plan). If law enforcement has been involved in crises, some communities have outreach with police (like CIT – Crisis Intervention Team officers) to improve police-nurse collaboration in managing acute psychotic crises in the field.

In essence, interprofessional collaboration creates a safety net around the patient. Each professional addresses a piece of the puzzle: medication, therapy, life skills, social support, physical health. By coordinating these pieces, the team can achieve what one discipline alone cannot – comprehensive, continuous care that addresses the biological, psychological, and social aspects of psychotic disorders, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

Ethical and Legal Considerations

Caring for individuals with psychosis entails navigating various ethical and legal challenges. Mental health nurses must balance patient rights and autonomy with the need to provide effective treatment, often in situations where patients may not fully understand their condition. Below are key considerations:

In conclusion, caring for psychosis involves an ongoing ethical balancing act: patients’ rights vs. patients’ needs when they cannot recognize those needs. The guiding light is always the patient’s best interest – doing good and preventing harm, while striving to preserve as much autonomy and dignity as possible. Nurses should utilize ethics committees or consultations in their facilities when unsure, and stay informed on mental health laws in their state. By upholding principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, justice, and veracity, psychiatric nurses serve as compassionate advocates, ensuring that even when patients lose touch with reality, their humanity and rights are never lost.

Through understanding the spectrum of psychotic disorders – from schizophrenia to mood-related psychoses – and their multifaceted management, nursing students can appreciate that treating psychosis is not just about controlling symptoms but about holistic care. It involves biological treatment, psychological support, social rehabilitation, patient empowerment, and ethical practice. By combining knowledge of neurobiology and medications with therapeutic communication and interdisciplinary collaboration, nurses help patients like Alex and Maria move from chaos and fear towards stability and hope. Psychotic disorders are complex and often chronic, but with evidence-based interventions and a caring, structured approach, many individuals recover to lead meaningful lives. Nurses, often at the center of care, have the privilege and responsibility to make a profound difference in this journey of recovery.

References

  1. Hany, M., Rehman, B., Rizvi, A., & Chapman, J. (2024). Schizophrenia. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. (Updated Feb 23, 2024). Available from NCBI Bookshelf.

  2. Wy, T. J. P., & Saadabadi, A. (2023). Schizoaffective Disorder. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. (Updated Mar 27, 2023). Available from NCBI Bookshelf.

  3. Stephen, A., & Lui, F. (2023). Brief Psychotic Disorder. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. (Updated June 25, 2023). Available from NCBI Bookshelf.

  4. Joseph, S. M., & Siddiqui, W. (2023). Delusional Disorder. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. (Updated Mar 27, 2023). Available from NCBI Bookshelf.

  5. Calabrese, J., Al Khalili, Y., & Shaheen, K. (2023). Psychosis (Nursing). StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. (Updated May 1, 2023). Available from NCBI Bookshelf.

  6. Marder, S. R., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(18), 1753-1761. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1808803

  7. Jauhar, S., Johnstone, M., & McKenna, P. J. (2022). Schizophrenia. The Lancet, 399(10323), 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01730-X

  8. McCutcheon, R. A., Krystal, J. H., & Howes, O. D. (2020). Dopamine and glutamate in schizophrenia: biology, symptoms and treatment. World Psychiatry, 19(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20619

  9. Davis, J., Eyre, H., Jacka, F. N., et al. (2016). A review of vulnerability and risks for schizophrenia: Beyond the two-hit hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 65, 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.017

  10. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. (2014). Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature, 511(7510), 421-427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13595

  11. Keepers, G. A., Fochtmann, L. J., Anzia, J. M., et al. (2020). The American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 177(9), 868-872. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.177901

  12. Pillinger, T., McCutcheon, R. A., Vano, L., et al. (2020). Comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30416-X

  13. Pharoah, F., Rathbone, J., Mari, J. J., & Wong, W. (2010). Family intervention for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (12), CD000088. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000088.pub2

  14. Sudak, D. M., Aaronson, C. J., & Gunn, B. A. (2021). Psychosocial Treatments for Schizophrenia: An Update. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 44(3), 521-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2021.05.001

  15. Ernstmeyer, K., & Christman, E. (Eds.). (2022). Nursing: Mental Health and Community Concepts. Eau Claire, WI: Chippewa Valley Technical College – Open RN. (Chapter 5: Legal and Ethical Considerations in Mental Health Care). Retrieved from NCBI Bookshelf.